<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Green Power Users — Ready for a Shock?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedigitalnirvana.com/2009/09/top-10-green-power-users-%e2%80%94-ready-for-a-shock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedigitalnirvana.com/2009/09/top-10-green-power-users-%e2%80%94-ready-for-a-shock/</link>
	<description>Transpromo, Short-Run Book Publishing, Inkjet and other Printing Industry Issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:01:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalnirvana.com/2009/09/top-10-green-power-users-%e2%80%94-ready-for-a-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-2283</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalnirvana.com/?p=809#comment-2283</guid>
		<description>The top 10 list shows companies who can afford to buy offsets, not those who actually produce their own power on-site. My employer, Phoenix Press, of New Haven, CT is in the final stages of installing its own Northwind 100 kw wind turbine ON-SITE.

Since our annual revenues are tiny compared to the large organizations on the list (we are a customer of Mohawk Paper), we went further and actually produce (Fall &#039;09) our own electricity for our printing operation. NO offsets here!

The Top 10 list should take into consideration the annual revenues of a company in relation to it&#039;s financial commitment towards ON-SITE electricity generation, not the purchasing of credits (permission-to-pollute).

It&#039;s good to see companies &quot;get it&quot; that pollution ultimately hurts their bottom line, but in the end, Top Performers can&#039;t all be multi-million dollar companies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The top 10 list shows companies who can afford to buy offsets, not those who actually produce their own power on-site. My employer, Phoenix Press, of New Haven, CT is in the final stages of installing its own Northwind 100 kw wind turbine ON-SITE.</p>
<p>Since our annual revenues are tiny compared to the large organizations on the list (we are a customer of Mohawk Paper), we went further and actually produce (Fall &#8217;09) our own electricity for our printing operation. NO offsets here!</p>
<p>The Top 10 list should take into consideration the annual revenues of a company in relation to it&#8217;s financial commitment towards ON-SITE electricity generation, not the purchasing of credits (permission-to-pollute).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to see companies &#8220;get it&#8221; that pollution ultimately hurts their bottom line, but in the end, Top Performers can&#8217;t all be multi-million dollar companies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Lazerus</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalnirvana.com/2009/09/top-10-green-power-users-%e2%80%94-ready-for-a-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-2279</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Lazerus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalnirvana.com/?p=809#comment-2279</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this, Heidi. Looking at the list, there are numerous printing companies also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, Heidi. Looking at the list, there are numerous printing companies also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

