<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choosing Digital Printing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedigitalnirvana.com/2009/10/choosing-digital-printing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedigitalnirvana.com/2009/10/choosing-digital-printing</link>
	<description>Transpromo, Short-Run Book Publishing, Inkjet and other Printing Industry Issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Raus</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalnirvana.com/2009/10/choosing-digital-printing/comment-page-1#comment-2569</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Raus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalnirvana.com/?p=892#comment-2569</guid>
		<description>George&#039;s comment seems a bit extreme to me and I would like to hear from Margie or members of her group on George&#039;s question:  &quot;These factors (print quality and cost per page) are no longer important in many (most?) buying decisions.&quot; 

What is the importance of price and (offset-like) print quality to customer&#039;s like BCBS?  Certainly there is going to always be the need for excellent print quality - for key marketing materials.  The question is – what % of documents REALLY need that level of quality?  Do customers like BCBS and others really need (and want to pay for) 150 line screen (digital) work and 1200x1200 dpi image quality for items such as statements, bills, invoices, booklets, letters, notices, etc.?

The new Mid-Volume Transaction Output (MVTO) web site from RISO (http://us.riso.com/mvto) sheds some light on the use of cost-effective communications-level color and the quality levels really required for transactional and other short-life documents.  With the adoption of roll-fed inkjet presses increasing, it is clear that some level of quality is &quot;good enough&quot; for the right price and speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George&#8217;s comment seems a bit extreme to me and I would like to hear from Margie or members of her group on George&#8217;s question:  &#8220;These factors (print quality and cost per page) are no longer important in many (most?) buying decisions.&#8221; </p>
<p>What is the importance of price and (offset-like) print quality to customer&#8217;s like BCBS?  Certainly there is going to always be the need for excellent print quality &#8211; for key marketing materials.  The question is – what % of documents REALLY need that level of quality?  Do customers like BCBS and others really need (and want to pay for) 150 line screen (digital) work and 1200&#215;1200 dpi image quality for items such as statements, bills, invoices, booklets, letters, notices, etc.?</p>
<p>The new Mid-Volume Transaction Output (MVTO) web site from RISO (<a href="http://us.riso.com/mvto" rel="nofollow">http://us.riso.com/mvto</a>) sheds some light on the use of cost-effective communications-level color and the quality levels really required for transactional and other short-life documents.  With the adoption of roll-fed inkjet presses increasing, it is clear that some level of quality is &#8220;good enough&#8221; for the right price and speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Jourdan</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalnirvana.com/2009/10/choosing-digital-printing/comment-page-1#comment-2567</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Jourdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalnirvana.com/?p=892#comment-2567</guid>
		<description>Adam:

That is a nice piece on BCBS...however it only tells us half the story, and this is where many struggle with helping clients transition tho digital?  Where are Jim&#039;s results?  He gave a nice expalantion of the WHY they did an &#039;unofficial evlauation in 2008&#039;...but then what?

What were the results of this digital transition @ BCBS?  He talks of &#039;potentially 100s of thousands of dollars&#039;.  Did they get there?

Clients are always looking for the ROI.  That &#039;maybes &amp; what ifs&quot; are sexy to talk about...but how about the real world results?

Would love to hear how the story ends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam:</p>
<p>That is a nice piece on BCBS&#8230;however it only tells us half the story, and this is where many struggle with helping clients transition tho digital?  Where are Jim&#8217;s results?  He gave a nice expalantion of the WHY they did an &#8216;unofficial evlauation in 2008&#8242;&#8230;but then what?</p>
<p>What were the results of this digital transition @ BCBS?  He talks of &#8216;potentially 100s of thousands of dollars&#8217;.  Did they get there?</p>
<p>Clients are always looking for the ROI.  That &#8216;maybes &amp; what ifs&#8221; are sexy to talk about&#8230;but how about the real world results?</p>
<p>Would love to hear how the story ends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Alexander</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalnirvana.com/2009/10/choosing-digital-printing/comment-page-1#comment-2542</link>
		<dc:creator>George Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalnirvana.com/?p=892#comment-2542</guid>
		<description>Something fundamental has changed in attitudes toward digital printing, and it’s reflected in Margie’s list and in the quote from Massachusetts BCBS. Print quality and and cost per page used to be the major factors that justified choosing offset printing. These factors are no longer important in many (most?) buying decisions. Neither of them is mentioned in the list or the BCBS quote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something fundamental has changed in attitudes toward digital printing, and it’s reflected in Margie’s list and in the quote from Massachusetts BCBS. Print quality and and cost per page used to be the major factors that justified choosing offset printing. These factors are no longer important in many (most?) buying decisions. Neither of them is mentioned in the list or the BCBS quote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
